The highest level of evidence, and you do not need a single patient to produce it. Bring a clinical question. We help you run the search, screening, extraction, risk-of-bias assessment and pooling, and develop a PRISMA-compliant manuscript under your name.
Discuss your question on WhatsAppThe usual reason faculty never start a paper is that they have no dataset and no time to recruit patients. A systematic review needs neither.
The raw material is published literature, so there is nothing to collect and no follow-up to wait for.
Published, de-identified data rarely needs full committee review. Check your institution's waiver policy.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses sit at the top of the evidence hierarchy and are widely cited.
The best questions come from a clinical decision you make every week and still argue about.
Every meta-analysis sits inside a systematic review. Whether you can pool depends on how similar the included studies are.
| Systematic review | Meta-analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Finds, appraises and summarises every eligible study | Also pools the results statistically into one estimate |
| Needs | A focused question and a pre-specified method | Enough comparable studies reporting the same outcome |
| Main outputs | PRISMA flow diagram, study tables, risk-of-bias summary, narrative synthesis | All of that, plus forest plots, heterogeneity (I²) and, where there are enough studies, funnel plots |
| Reporting standard | PRISMA 2020 | |
On a free consultation call we turn your clinical idea into a PICO question and check that enough studies exist to answer it.
A written protocol with eligibility criteria and outcomes, and PROSPERO or INPLASY registration if you want it.
A documented, reproducible search, two-stage screening recorded in a PRISMA flow diagram, and structured data extraction.
Risk-of-bias assessment with a standard tool such as RoB 2 or Newcastle-Ottawa, then pooling and forest plots where the studies allow it.
A PRISMA 2020 compliant manuscript, and a shortlist of indexed journals with indexing verified before you submit.
The range depends on how many studies your question returns and how complex the pooling is. We quote a fixed price after the consultation, before you pay anything.
Two-article package: one systematic review plus one case series of 3 to 5 cases, developed together over 30 to 45 days, for ₹29,999. Payment by UPI or bank transfer; milestone payments are available for larger projects.
No. A systematic review or meta-analysis analyses studies that are already published, so you need a focused clinical question, not a dataset of your own patients.
Usually not, because it uses published, de-identified data. Some institutions still ask for a waiver letter, so check your own institution's policy before you start.
Registration is strongly recommended and many journals expect it. We can prepare and submit a PROSPERO registration for ₹4,999, or an INPLASY registration, which is faster and gives a DOI, for ₹5,999 plus the INPLASY fee of USD 40.
A systematic review finds, appraises and summarises every eligible study on a question using a pre-specified method. A meta-analysis goes one step further and statistically pools the results into a single estimate, usually shown as a forest plot.
You are. You choose the question, give the clinical direction and review every draft, and the manuscript is submitted under your name.
Send us the clinical question on WhatsApp. We will check whether the literature can answer it and quote a fixed price before you commit.
Start a free consultation